Deep Dives Articles
DEEP DIVES ARTICLE — EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Who Are You Under Pressure? The Two Faces of Human Behavior
This is a sneak peek of this week’s Deep Dives article — published today! Become a Deep Dives Member to get access to the full article.
It’s easy to be composed when everything’s going well—but who are you when the heat is on? This Deep Dive explores the psychology of stress, identity, and emotional control—revealing how your “stress self” can shape (or sabotage) your leadership. You’ll learn how high performers stay grounded under pressure—and how to close the gap between who you are and who you want to be.
➡️ Want to lead from a place of strength, not stress? Access the full article by joining our Deep Dives Membership today.
DEEP DIVES ARTICLE — PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT
Forget Motivation. Build Grit.
This is a sneak peek of this week’s Deep Dives article — published today! Become a Deep Dives Member to get access to the full article.
Motivation is fleeting. Grit gets results. This Deep Dive flips the conventional wisdom about inspiration and reveals why discipline, consistency, and resilience—not fleeting emotion—are what actually drive performance. Whether you’re leading a team or trying to level up personally, this is your roadmap for pushing through when motivation fails.
➡️ If you’re done waiting to “feel like it,” the full Deep Dive is available with your membership.
DEEP DIVES ARTICLE — LEADERSHIP
The Leadership Blind Spot: 10 Mistakes Even Smart Leaders Make
This is a sneak peek of this week’s Deep Dives article — published today! Become a Deep Dives Member to get access to the full article.
Even the best leaders have blind spots—and most don’t know they’re making these mistakes until it’s too late. From confusing influence with authority to hiring for skill but firing for fit, this Deep Dive uncovers the most common leadership missteps—and how to avoid them. Grounded in research and real-world examples, this is a must-read for anyone serious about leading with integrity.
➡️ Ready to sharpen your edge as a leader? Get full access with our Deep Dives Membership.
Deep Dives Book Summary
The Road to Character
By David Brooks
This is a sneak peek of this week’s Deep Dives Book Review — published today! Become a Deep Dives Member to get access to the full Book Summary.
We live in a culture that rewards success, visibility, and the résumé virtues. But what about the deeper, quieter traits that define who we are at our core? In this powerful Deep Dive, we explore David Brooks’ The Road to Character—a compelling call to build moral depth in a world obsessed with achievement. From Eisenhower to Dorothy Day, this summary reveals the lives, lessons, and humility code behind true greatness.
➡️ Want to live for more than applause? Subscribe to our Deep Dives Membership for the full chapter-by-chapter breakdown and reflection prompts.
Quick Reads
quick read — Emotional intelligence
Beyond Soft Skills: Is Emotional Intelligence in Leadership Overrated?
In the last two decades, emotional intelligence (EQ) has gone from a buzzword to a near-sacred leadership trait. It’s been hailed as the missing ingredient for effective leadership—a magic blend of empathy, self-awareness, and interpersonal savvy that separates good leaders from great ones. But in an era driven by metrics, innovation, and speed, it’s worth asking the controversial question: Is emotional intelligence in leadership overrated?
The Rise of EQ as a Leadership Must-Have Daniel Goleman’s groundbreaking work in the 1990s popularized the idea that emotional intelligence could matter more than IQ in determining success, particularly for leaders. Since then, business schools, HR departments, and coaching firms have touted EQ as essential for team engagement, decision-making, conflict resolution, and organizational culture.
The case seemed clear: Leaders with high EQs inspire loyalty, foster collaboration, and navigate complexity with grace. Research supports this, with studies showing EQ correlates with higher employee satisfaction, better retention, and more cohesive teams. But is that the full picture?
Where the Argument Falters While EQ is undoubtedly valuable, problems arise when it’s treated as a panacea—an all-powerful leadership superpower that outweighs other competencies.
Where the Danger Lies
No. 1 — EQ Without Competence is Dangerous
A leader with high EQ but low technical or strategic competence can still fail dramatically. Charisma and empathy might earn trust, but without execution, vision, or domain expertise, teams flounder. Emotional intelligence should complement hard skills, not replace them.
No. 2 — High EQ Can Mask Manipulation
EQ involves understanding and influencing emotions. In the wrong hands, this becomes a tool for manipulation. Leaders can use emotional attunement to avoid accountability, deflect criticism, or control narratives under the guise of empathy. The veneer of EQ doesn’t always indicate ethical leadership.
No. 3 — EQ Often Gets Confused with Agreeableness
Being emotionally intelligent doesn’t mean being nice all the time. In fact, tough decisions and radical candor often require emotional discipline. But many organizations mistake emotional intelligence for softness or accommodation, discouraging directness, confrontation, and urgency—all of which are vital in high-performance environments.
No. 4 — EQ Can Become a Bottleneck for Speed
Hyperfocus on feelings can slow decision-making. In high-stakes or time-sensitive situations, too much emotional processing can create inertia. While empathy matters, over-indexing on emotional alignment can come at the cost of agility and execution.
The Underrated Counterweights To understand EQ in context, it helps to examine what else leaders need that doesn’t get as much spotlight:
- Decisiveness. Many high-EQ leaders excel in harmony, but struggle with conflict or ambiguity. Bold, timely decision-making is often the difference-maker in leadership success.
- Visionary Thinking. Leaders must hold and communicate a clear strategic direction. EQ helps with alignment, but it doesn’t generate the vision itself.
- Technical Mastery. In industries like tech, healthcare, or finance, leaders who lack a grasp of the core business often rely too heavily on EQ to “manage up” or down, losing credibility.
- Courage. High EQ without courage can lead to “pleaser” leadership. The best leaders take unpopular stands when necessary, even at the risk of emotional discomfort.
What the Data Really Says EQ does correlate with better leadership outcomes—but only when paired with other traits. A 2018 meta-analysis found that while emotional intelligence explains some variance in leadership effectiveness, cognitive ability and conscientiousness remained equally critical.
Moreover, the best leaders tend to demonstrate situational intelligence: knowing when to lean into empathy and when to drive forward, when to listen deeply and when to draw a line.
When EQ Matters Most Let’s be clear: Emotional intelligence matters enormously in certain contexts:
- Crisis leadership. Calming a panicked team or navigating layoffs with empathy demands EQ.
- Change management. Emotions run high in transitions; EQ helps leaders guide teams through uncertainty.
- Team building and coaching. Emotional attunement builds psychological safety and trust.
- Cross-functional collaboration.Diverse teams thrive when led by someone skilled in emotional nuance.
But in moments requiring rapid execution, firm decisions, or intellectual rigor, EQ alone won’t carry the day.
A Call for Balance, Not Dismissal To ask whether EQ is overrated isn’t to say it’s unimportant—only that it’s incomplete. Leadership is complex. It requires a mosaic of traits: vision, humility, resilience, drive, strategy, ethics, and yes, emotional intelligence. But inflating one quality to mythic status does a disservice to leaders and teams alike.
So what should leaders strive for?
- Develop EQ, but anchor it in values and courage.
- Use empathy to connect, but don’t be afraid to challenge.
- Build emotional fluency, but don’t let it become emotional fragility.
- Pair emotional awareness with execution, clarity, and accountability.
Emotion With Backbone
The best leaders don’t just feel deeply—they lead decisively. They don’t just listen compassionately—they act boldly. Emotional intelligence is a powerful tool, but it is only one instrument in the leadership orchestra.
Let’s stop treating EQ as the entire symphony. It’s time to balance emotional wisdom with strategic thinking, moral clarity, and fearless execution. Because at the end of the day, leadership isn’t just about being liked—it’s about delivering results that matter.
quick read — Personal development
Blurred Mirrors: The Double-Edged Danger of Impostor Syndrome and the Dunning-Kruger Effect
In the world of personal growth and leadership, perception matters as much as performance. But what happens when that perception is distorted—not by others, but by ourselves? Two psychological phenomena sit on opposite ends of the self-awareness spectrum: Impostor Syndrome and the Dunning-Kruger Effect. Though radically different, both can be equally dangerous—not just to the individuals experiencing them, but to teams, organizations, and cultures at large.
Understanding the Spectrum
- Impostor Syndrome affects high-achievers who, despite tangible success, believe they are not as competent as others perceive them to be. They live in fear of being “found out,” attributing accomplishments to luck, timing, or other external factors.
- Dunning-Kruger Effect occurs when individuals with limited knowledge or skill overestimate their capabilities. Because they lack the metacognitive ability to recognize their own deficiencies, they remain unaware of how little they know.
Both are rooted in distorted self-awareness, but where impostor syndrome breeds undue self-doubt, the Dunning-Kruger effect cultivates unearned overconfidence. Each presents a unique set of challenges—especially in environments that depend on clear thinking, decision-making, and collaboration.
The Silent Struggle: Impostor Syndrome
At first glance, someone with impostor syndrome might seem polished, productive, and perpetually prepared. But behind the scenes, they’re battling anxiety, perfectionism, and a relentless inner critic.
Common symptoms include:
- Difficulty internalizing success
- Overworking to “cover up” perceived incompetence
- Discounting praise or attributing it to flukes
- Fear of being exposed as a “fraud”
Dangers in the Workplace:
- Burnout. Impostor feelings often lead to chronic overworking. High-achievers try to compensate for their perceived inadequacy, which is unsustainable.
- Stifled Innovation. Individuals may hold back bold ideas or strategic risks out of fear that failure will confirm their worst suspicions.
- Low Confidence Leadership. Even those in positions of authority might second-guess decisions, defer excessively to others, or avoid necessary conflict.
Team Impact: Impostor syndrome doesn’t just hurt the individual; it can cause ripple effects across a team. When leaders question themselves too much, they may delay decisions or miss opportunities. When team members feel inadequate, they may stay silent in meetings, even when they hold the key insight.
The Blind Spot: Dunning-Kruger Effect
On the flip side, the Dunning-Kruger Effect is marked by a deficit of self-awareness so profound that individuals fail to recognize their limitations. This is not arrogance per se, but ignorance of incompetence.
Common indicators include:
- Inflated self-assessments of skill or intelligence
- Dismissal of expert input
- Overconfidence in decision-making without adequate data
- Lack of curiosity or feedback-seeking behavior
Dangers in the Workplace:
- Risky Decisions. Overconfident individuals may make critical mistakes, especially when they resist collaboration or correction.
- Toxic Culture. When leaders suffer from Dunning-Kruger, they may create environments where true expertise is undervalued or silenced.
- Poor Performance. Individuals might be unaware of performance gaps, making growth difficult or impossible.
Team Impact: Team morale often suffers under Dunning-Kruger leadership. Competent employees may feel dismissed, undervalued, or even resentful. Innovation suffers because critical thinking is stifled by overbearing confidence.
When the Extremes Collide
Ironically, organizations often host both types of individuals. You may have a quietly brilliant analyst crippled by impostor syndrome and a confident underperformer influencing strategic decisions. The imbalance can be destructive:
- The wrong voices dominate conversations.
- The right voices second-guess themselves into silence.
- Promotions and leadership roles go to those who “seem” confident, not those who are capable.
This imbalance is compounded by confirmation bias. Leaders might reward overconfidence, mistaking it for competence, while overlooking humble or cautious high performers.
Bridging the Gap: Cultivating Accurate Self-Awareness
The goal isn’t to diagnose everyone in your office—it’s to create a culture where accurate self-perception is the norm, not the exception. Here’s how:
No. 1 — Normalize Feedback Loops
Encourage regular, honest, and specific feedback across all levels of an organization. When done respectfully, it can sharpen self-awareness and reduce both impostor anxiety and overconfidence.
No. 2 — Celebrate Learning, Not Just Results
Build a culture where asking questions and admitting gaps in knowledge is seen as strength, not weakness. High performers will feel safer acknowledging learning curves, while low performers will be encouraged to grow.
No. 3 — Watch for Overcompensation
If someone is over-apologizing, overworking, or under-crediting themselves, check in. They may be struggling with impostor feelings. Conversely, if someone is dominating without results to back it up, gently probe for their rationale.
No. 4 — Train for Emotional Intelligence
Both phenomena are rooted in low self-awareness. EQ training, coaching, and mentoring can help individuals calibrate how they see themselves versus how others see them.
No. 5 — Separate Confidence from Competence in Hiring & Promotions
Confidence is not a proxy for ability. Create evaluation frameworks that look at outcomes, behavior under pressure, and learning agility rather than self-promotion.
Personal Takeaways
Whether you’re prone to self-doubt or self-inflation, the antidote is the same: radical self-honesty.
- If you resonate with impostor syndrome, remind yourself: feelings are not facts. Track your wins. Ask trusted peers how they see your strengths.
- If you suspect a Dunning-Kruger blind spot, seek feedback. Test assumptions. Practice humility by being curious, not just confident.
The journey toward accurate self-awareness is lifelong. But those who pursue it lead better, grow faster, and contribute more meaningfully.
Whether you see yourself as an impostor or unknowingly overestimate your skill, both ends of the spectrum share one thing in common: they distort your potential. One keeps you playing small. The other sets you up for missteps. The antidote is not to land in the middle by chance—it’s to build self-awareness by design.
In leadership, in teams, and in life, clarity is power. Let’s learn to see ourselves clearly—not through the lens of fear or ego, but through the mirror of truth.
quick read — LEADERSHIP
The Lens Problem: How Confirmation Bias Distorts Our View of High and Low Performers
In the world of leadership, we like to think we make decisions based on facts, fairness, and data. We believe we reward our top performers and give thoughtful coaching to those who are struggling. But what if we’re not as objective as we think? What if, without realizing it, we’re seeing people not as they are—but as we expect them to be?
This is the insidious effect of confirmation bias: the mental shortcut that leads us to favor information that confirms what we already believe and ignore information that contradicts it. While this bias plays out in all areas of life, its impact on how we interact with high performers and poor performers can quietly derail team dynamics, talent development, and even culture itself.
Let’s take a deeper look at how confirmation bias shows up in the workplace—and how leaders can challenge it before it compromises growth and fairness.
The Halo and Horn Effect: A Subset of Confirmation Bias
In psychology, there’s a well-documented cognitive bias called the Halo Effect—the tendency to let one positive impression influence our entire view of a person. If someone delivers great results, we assume they’re also collaborative, dependable, emotionally intelligent, and a team player.
The inverse, the Horn Effect, works the same way in reverse. If someone makes a mistake or underperforms, we often assume they’re lazy, uncommitted, or not team-oriented—even if those assumptions aren’t objectively supported.
These effects are both forms of confirmation bias. Once a label is mentally applied, we subconsciously seek evidence to reinforce it and dismiss evidence that contradicts it.
How Confirmation Bias Distorts Feedback for High Performers
High performers often start off on a pedestal—and that’s where the bias begins. Here’s how confirmation bias can show up:
- Overlooking behavior issues: A top sales rep who brings in record-breaking numbers might be consistently late to meetings or undercutting peers. But leaders may ignore these warning signs because “they’re a rockstar.”
- Explaining away mistakes: When high performers falter, it’s often attributed to external factors—“they’re just stressed” or “that was an anomaly”—rather than holding them to the same standards as others.
- Withholding developmental feedback: Leaders may avoid giving constructive feedback to top performers out of fear of “rocking the boat” or damaging morale. Ironically, this robs them of growth.
The risk? We end up with “untouchables”—high performers who are shielded from accountability, and whose weaknesses compound over time until they create real damage to team dynamics.
How Confirmation Bias Burdens Struggling Performers
On the flip side, struggling or lower-performing team members often get trapped by early labels that become self-fulfilling:
- Interpreting neutral behavior as negative: A lower performer asking a question in a meeting might be seen as not paying attention—while the same question from a high performer is seen as thoughtful.
- Over-scrutinizing mistakes: When someone is already viewed as underperforming, every small misstep becomes confirmation of that belief—even if others make the same errors without scrutiny.
- Ignoring progress: Improvements are minimized, downplayed, or missed entirely. Leaders may unconsciously look for reasons the progress “doesn’t count” or isn’t “sustainable.”
The result? These employees stop trying. They begin to believe the label themselves. What could have been a coachable contributor is sidelined—not by lack of skill, but by the weight of bias.
The Long-Term Impact on Culture and Performance
When confirmation bias goes unchecked, it creates a toxic feedback loop that affects the entire organization.
- Team division: Peers begin to notice double standards—top performers are praised no matter what, and others can’t seem to catch a break. Trust erodes.
- Talent loss: Struggling team members who might have thrived with support leave discouraged. Meanwhile, high performers who aren’t held accountable may become entitled or complacent.
- Inaccurate succession planning: Promotions and key opportunities go to those with the “right reputation,” not necessarily the right readiness or potential.
What began as subconscious shortcuts in perception quietly metastasize into structural inequity.
Why It’s So Hard to See—and Stop
Part of what makes confirmation bias so powerful is that it doesn’t feel like bias. It feels like instinct. It masquerades as “gut feeling,” “pattern recognition,” or “leadership intuition.”
Leaders who are otherwise thoughtful and fair can still fall prey to it, especially under pressure. Tight deadlines, growing teams, and stress increase our reliance on cognitive shortcuts. And when we’re tired or emotionally drained, we default to mental habits that prioritize speed over accuracy.
5 Ways to Interrupt Confirmation Bias as a Leader
No. 1 — Use structured feedback mechanisms.
Relying on casual observations to assess people invites bias. Use scorecards, peer reviews, 360 feedback, and objective metrics. If possible, anonymize feedback to reduce name-based halo/horn effects. No. 2 — Separate the “what” from the “who.”
Ask: If this same action came from someone else on the team, how would I react? This helps neutralize favoritism and allows you to evaluate the behavior, not the persona. No. 3 — Actively seek disconfirming evidence.
Intentionally look for data that contradicts your assumptions. If you think someone is “not engaged,” can you find examples where they were? If you think someone is “always on top of it,” look for blind spots or areas they’ve neglected.
No. 4 — Narrate your thinking in talent discussions.
When discussing promotions or development opportunities, explain your reasoning out loud. If you hear yourself say, “They just have that ‘it’ factor,” dig deeper. What behaviors back that up?
No. 5 — Give equal energy to coaching all levels.
Great leaders don’t just coach high performers—they build them. Make time to support struggling employees with the same curiosity and rigor you give your top talent. Growth can come from unexpected places.
Empathy and Accountability
None of this is to say that leaders should treat everyone equally. People have different strengths, growth curves, and contributions. But they should be treated equitably—with clarity, fairness, and the opportunity to evolve.
High performers need honest feedback and accountability to keep growing. Struggling performers need belief, support, and clarity to move forward.
In both cases, your job isn’t just to manage what you see—it’s to manage how you’re seeing.
Because the best leaders don’t just shape culture with decisions. They shape it with perception.
And when perception is grounded in curiosity, not assumption, your whole team gets better.
In short: See clearly. Coach fairly. Lead wisely.
Don’t let old assumptions write the future of your people.
Quotes of the Week
QUOTE — EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE
QUOTE — PERSONAL DEVELOPMENT
QUOTE — LEADERSHIP
Reframe
Upside Down Leadership: Why You’re Pushing Hard at the Worst Possible Time
Great leadership isn’t just about knowing what to do. It’s about knowing when to do it.
And yet, many leaders fall into the same trap—especially during periods of success or struggle. When things are going well, they ease off the gas. Teams are hitting targets, the mood is upbeat, and everyone seems to be cruising. So the leader steps back. They become more hands-off. They coast.
But the moment performance dips—sales slow, projects stall, or team energy drops—those same leaders slam on the accelerator. Suddenly it’s “all hands on deck.” More pressure. More urgency. More micromanagement.
This inverted response feels natural, but it’s one of the most common—and damaging—patterns in leadership. Because the time to push, to raise the bar, and to deepen alignment is precisely when things are going well. And the time to hold steady, coach with care, and reduce pressure is exactly when things are falling apart.
Let’s unpack why.
The Problem with Pushing in a Crisis
When the team is struggling—morale is low, results are down, and energy is scattered—leaders often panic. They double down on performance metrics. They increase pressure. They set tighter deadlines and demand faster turnaround.
On the surface, this seems logical: we’re behind, so we have to work harder.
But here’s what actually happens when you push harder during a downturn:
No. 1 — You Add Pressure to an Already Maxed-Out System
When things aren’t going well, your team is already under stress. Emotions are high. Confidence is low. The bandwidth for learning, innovation, or extra effort is limited.
According to the Yerkes-Dodson Law, performance increases with physiological or mental arousal—but only up to a point. Too much pressure leads to cognitive overload, decreased focus, and emotional reactivity. The brain literally shifts into survival mode.
So when leaders apply more pressure in these moments, they don’t get more output—they get burnout, mistakes, and disengagement.
No. 2 — You Miss the Root Cause
When urgency rises, reflection decreases. In crisis, it’s easy to focus on surface-level symptoms—missed KPIs, low morale, poor output—without addressing the deeper issues: system inefficiencies, lack of clarity, unclear expectations, or even poor leadership communication.
Pushing harder during a downturn often masks systemic problems rather than solving them.
No. 3 — You Fracture Psychological Safety
When leaders only show up with intensity during failure, teams associate that intensity with punishment. They stop taking risks. They avoid honest conversations. They hunker down and try to avoid blame rather than solve problems.
According to a 2017 Google study on high-performing teams (“Project Aristotle”), psychological safety—the belief that one won’t be punished for speaking up—is the single most important factor in team effectiveness. Pressure during tough times threatens that safety.
The Missed Opportunity: When Things Are Going Well
Ironically, the best time to challenge your team, raise expectations, and innovate is when things are working. But that’s exactly when many leaders back off.
Here’s why that’s a mistake:
No. 1 — You Lose Momentum
Momentum is a fragile gift. When a team is performing well, energy is high, confidence is strong, and the culture is primed for stretch goals. This is the exact time to raise the bar—not with more hours, but with more intention, creativity, and accountability.
Instead, many leaders let the team coast. They mistake current success for sustained excellence. But as Jim Collins famously said in Good to Great, “The good is the enemy of the great.” The minute you stop building, you start eroding.
No. 2 — You Miss Your Leverage Point
When a team is in a good place, they have the emotional and cognitive bandwidth to absorb stretch challenges, learn new systems, or pursue bolder goals.
This is when to:
- Introduce better processes
- Reinforce team norms
- Push for cross-functional collaboration
- Clarify long-term vision and strategic positioning
Because the cost of change is much lower when people feel safe and successful.
No. 3 — You Fail to Develop Your People
One of the most overlooked dangers of sustained success is underdevelopment. When leaders stop pushing, people stop growing.
Top performers want challenge. They want feedback. They want opportunities to stretch. When they don’t get it, they disengage or leave. According to a 2022 LinkedIn Workplace Learning Report, 94% of employees say they would stay at a company longer if it invested in their development.
So if you’re not coaching hard when things are going well, you’re creating the illusion of stability while sowing the seeds of future turnover.
Why Leaders Get This Backwards
This upside-down leadership pattern isn’t due to laziness or incompetence. It’s a human response to risk, stress, and emotion. Here’s why it happens:
- Fear drives urgency. When the ship feels like it’s sinking, leaders jump into action—even if the action is reactive or misaligned.
- Success breeds complacency. When things are working, leaders breathe a sigh of relief. They assume, wrongly, that they can coast too.
- Effort is mistaken for progress. In a crisis, leaders often mistake more effort for the solution—even when what’s needed is better thinking.
What Great Leaders Do Instead
The most effective leaders flip the script. They push harder when things are good and slow down when things are not. Here’s how:
No. 1 — Use Success to Reinforce and Raise the Standard
When your team is winning, use that momentum to:
- Clarify what “great” looks like
- Set the next benchmark
- Identify the habits and systems that created success—and formalize them
Success is not the time to relax—it’s the time to institutionalize excellence.
No. 2 — Use Struggle to Coach, Not Crush
When the team is off-track:
- Ask more questions, give fewer commands
- Provide context and support, not pressure
- Focus on diagnosis before prescription
This is when your team needs psychological safety, clarity, and belief. Not panic.
No. 3 — Make Growth the Constant, Not the Variable
Don’t wait for things to break to start building. Build all the time.
- Celebrate wins and ask what could be better.
- Run post-mortems on successes, not just failures.
- Coach consistently—not just when someone is underperforming.
The best teams don’t rise to the occasion. They fall to the level of their preparation. Great leaders prepare them before the storm hits.
Lead Like a Pilot, Not a Passenger
In aviation, pilots don’t wait until a storm hits to check the controls. They prepare constantly. They monitor systems. They stay ahead of conditions. And when turbulence hits, they don’t slam the yoke—they adjust with care, clarity, and calm.
Leadership is no different.
Don’t coast when skies are clear. That’s the time to sharpen, stretch, and strengthen.
And don’t clamp down when the storm rolls in. That’s when your team needs calm hands and a steady voice.
Because leadership isn’t about reacting to performance — it’s about shaping it before it happens.